Yahoo奇摩 網頁搜尋

搜尋結果

  1. Contents. 1 The Facebook Open Source Team. 2 History. 3 Status. 4 Discussion 1. 4.1 Does Facebook Exploit Its Users? 4.2 The weakness of Facebook's advertizing model. 5 Discussion 2. 5.1 The Privacy issue: Facebook will never be safe. 5.2 Facebook as P2P Infrastructure? 5.3 Openness. 5.4 How Open Source is Facebook?

  2. We use case studies of the Open Web, Facebook, and Google to demonstrate that infrastructure studies provides a valuable approach to the evolution of shared, widely accessible systems and services of the type often provided or regulated by governments in the public interest.

  3. "Facebook aims to have 1 billion users and is somewhere near 500 million right now. Thats alot of people effectively working for free, creating wealth for the shareholders of facebook. User solidarity is a powerful tool which can be used to protect our interests now and in the future as we continue to enjoy the benefits of social networking.

  4. Retrieved from "https://wiki.p2pfoundation.net/index.php?title=Criticism_of_Facebook&oldid=59286"

  5. average of 1,000 people per issue as a result of distributing Pol.is surveys to a couple thousand people through Facebook ads on the Talk to Taiwan page (20,000+ members) and through other groups. The survey outcomes are then deliberated through ...

  6. Facebook takes very strong interpersonal influence dynamics -- the way people persuade each other face-to-face in small groups with peer pressure, reciprocity, flattery -- and allows those to be used on a mass scale because your social networks are built in. Friends influence friends, who influence friends, and that keeps rippling out.

  7. If real adversarial interoperability were restored, concludes Doctorow, people could fetch all their Facebook notifications, or post to Facebook, from other social networks, without being spied on by Facebook. People could again, that is, move to new services and

  1. 其他人也搜尋了