長照險比較2016 相關
廣告最高360萬醫療保障，住院最高每日給付8000元，每屆滿五年再領一萬生存金！立即試算保費. 住院一天最高給付8000元、大小手術都有保障，還有最高400萬意外保障，立即免費試算
- 加強全家人的醫療保障
住院+手術+意外 3大保障一次買齊
住院、手術、常見醫材皆有理賠
- 保費立即免費試算
快速找到最符合需求的醫療險
醫療x意外x手術x醫材保障一次擁有
- 小資族激推 用小錢買大保障
高CP醫療險 住院一天最高給付8千元
每滿五年領回一萬生存金
- 免費線上索取資料
馬上填寫資料，找到合適保險方案
小保費享大保障，找到最適合您的保險
- 加強全家人的醫療保障
搜尋結果
CommonEasy P2P Insurance Broker CommonEasy is a peer-to-peer insurance platform that utilizes the power of the crowd to collectively insure and protect material possessions, homes, and livelihoods. Besure P2P Insurance Broker Peer-to-peer risk sharing for property insurance, not currently launched. Friendsurance P2P Insurance Broker Pools users ...
Description. Nithin Coca: "LibreTaxi is a completely open-source project, meaning that developers can take the source code and adapt it for local uses. Since it was launched in Dec. 2016, the app, which can be used to find rides across the globe, has grown to 20,000 users. The highest use so far is in Taiwan, Iran, and Russia.
2016年6月19日 · Embracing marketization, social protection, and emancipation, the triple movement is designed to map the collision of those three political projects, each of which remains salient today. Thus, this figure will form the core of a new, quasi-Polanyian perspective that can clarify capitalist crisis in the 21st century." Source: Marketization ...
Famously, Polanyi distinguished two different relations in which markets can stand to society. On the one hand, markets can be “embedded,” enmeshed in non-economic institutions and subject to non-economic norms, such as “the just price” and “the fair wage.”. On the other hand, markets can be “disembedded,” freed from extra ...
More Information Bibliography A reading list by Tarleton Gillespie and Nick Seaver: "This list is an attempt to collect and categorize a growing critical literature on algorithms as social concerns. The work included spans sociology, anthropology, science and ...
This limits their ability to inspire change (Bennett et al., 2016; IPBES, 2016; Pereira, Sitas, Ravera, Jimenez‐Aceituno, & Merrie, 2019). Second, these scenarios are expert‐led and have not been legitimized through a co‐production process in which a plurality of perspectives are included (Duncan et al., 2018; Kok et al., 2016; Tengö et al., 2017).
The fiction of a painless circular economy that can allow us to continue growing as societies and as humanity is what I oppose when I use the expression “perma-circularity”. It says that while circular metabolisms are crucial, they have little positive impact if they remain a micro-level, plant-by-plant or sector-by-sector piecemeal dynamic ...
