搜尋結果
2015年6月21日 · While p-power people tend to see life as a zero-sum game in which there are winners and losers, s-power people are regulated by reflective judgment, self control, and social responsibility and are driven to win for wider, social purposes (McClelland, 1975).
- Description
- Discussion
- More Information
here's the background to the theory, reprinted fromhttp://www.masternewmedia.org/news/2006/02/27/p2p_economic_potential_as_an.htm For Alan Page Fiske, see http://www.rmt.ucla.edu/ (relational models), http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/anthro/faculty/fiske/(bio) "According to Fiske, there are four basic types of inter-subjective dynamics, valid across time...
Interpretation by Michel Bauwens
Every type of society or civilization is a mixture of these four modes, but it can plausibly be argued that one mode is always dominant and imprints the other subservient modes. Historically, the first dominant mode was kinship or lineage based reciprocity, the so-called tribal gift economies. The key relational aspect was 'belonging'. Gifts created obligations and relations beyond the next of kin, creating a wider field of exchange. Agricultural or feudal-type societies were dominated by aut...
Interpretation by David Ronfeldt
"my take on fiske is different from your own. you equate the tribal form with equality-matching, but i equate it to his communal-sharing form. you think his communal-sharing form matches p2p nicely. in my view, none of his forms match the network form the way i'd like. here's what i say there: - "One psychologist (Fiske, 1993) posits that all social relationships reduce to four forms of interaction: communal sharing, authority ranking, equality matching, and market pricing. People develop the...
Clarification by Alan Fiske
" Although I’m not an expert on economic anthropology, I think it’s clear that it’s crucial to distinguish between two types of ‘tribal’ societies: First there are subsistence hunting and gathering societies, which have little or no stored surplus. Although it’s a big generalization, the dominant principle for production and exchange in these foraging communities is usually CS; they are often strongly anti-AR. Second, there are a few hunting and gathering societies with stored surpluses and t...
Fiske, A. P., & Haslam, N. 2005. The four basic social bonds: Structures for coordinating interaction. In Mark Baldwin, Ed., Interpersonal Cognition, 267–298. New York: Guilford.Diamond of Participation. = facilitation methodology explained by Sam Kaner in his book. Sam Kaner himself gives it the full title as the "Diamond of Participatory Decision-Making" (p.20) He credits the help of Lenny Lind, Catherine Toldi, Sarah Fisk and Duane Berger.
2016年6月19日 · Embracing marketization, social protection, and emancipation, the triple movement is designed to map the collision of those three political projects, each of which remains salient today. Thus, this figure will form the core of a new, quasi-Polanyian perspective that can clarify capitalist crisis in the 21st century."
2021年4月22日 · Henry Andrews: "Wilber’s Mean Green Meme (MGM) has done more damage to Gravesian theory than nearly anything else. While he and Beck had a half-decent idea in creating it (motivate better Green through critique), Wilber became so enamored of pushing MGM as a central societal adversary (with Turquoise as the societal savior) that it ...
Definitions. The Commons is a general term for shared resources in which each stakeholder has an equal interest. Studies on the commons include the information commons with issues about public knowledge, the public domain, open science, and the free exchange of ideas -- all issues at the core of a direct democracy.
The Successor Ideology is communicated through a series of assertions, which may or may not be true. It contains an implicit theory of the individual and the individual’s relationship to the collective, which may or may not be tenable. It rests on certain premises
