Yahoo奇摩 網頁搜尋

搜尋結果

  1. 2005年9月5日 · The second and more interesting factor was that the CPU benchmark results came in about 30% higher in Windows 64bit. Here are some example from the CPU tests. (higher numbers are better) TEST: CPU - Integer Math. PT6 64bit, Win2003 64bit, Result = 193.3. PT6 32bit, Win2003 64bit, Result = 92.9. PT6 32bit, WinXP 32bit, Result = 92.9.

  2. 2019年3月21日 · For my purposes, single-thread performance is not usually significant since most of my machines are running at 100%, 24/7. Perusing the CPU Benchmark charts, I see the combined score and the single-thread score are given. With this information, is it possible to use a formula to come to an approximation of the multi-thread

  3. forums.passmark.com › performancetest › 45727-archive-passmark-cpu-benchmark-resultsArchive Passmark CPU benchmark results

    2019年11月4日 · Tweet. #2. Nov-04-2019, 09:43 PM. All the charts are updated daily as new results arrive and the averages get better. We don't keep a copy of old charts. Hello, i cant find any archive results of CPU benchmark results, maybe someone runs an archive or knows where to look for archive results. The result im looking for is Intel i5-9500 on 11.10.2019.

  4. 2013年12月4日 · Overall CPU mark is scaled down 6.5% to bring it closer in line to V8 results Wi, Xi 1.61409490426413000, CPU - Integer Math 0.78030297980205800, CPU - Floating Point Math 0.00298791011878377, CPU - Prime Numbers 0.00425539632371741, CPU 1. 0.

  5. Nov-07-2024, 01:48 PM. CPU Mark Scores for Intel Core i5-13400, i5-13500, and i3-14100 as of August 14, 2024. by sysadmin. Hello everyone, I'm wondering if it's possible to obtain the "CPU Mark" benchmark scores for the following processors as of August... Channel: PerformanceTest. Nov-06-2024, 01:08 PM.

  6. 2013年6月3日 · Jun-03-2013, 05:25 PM. We don't (or at least very rarely) benchmark CPUs ourselves for the CPU charts. Nearly all data in the charts comes from user submissions from our PerformanceTest software. For the E5-2448L and E5-2630L, it seems no-one has submitted any results thus far for these particular CPU model.

  7. 2016年9月14日 · Tweet. #2. Sep-14-2016, 05:36 AM. We license the data and supply it as CSV. But the CPU Mega page has sorting and some limited filtering. There is also more sorting & filtering available of individual results in the PerformanceTest software. Hi Passmark, First of all, I looked around for something like this but didn't see it anywhere.

  8. 2015年6月15日 · For example a [Dual CPU] Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 @ 2.60GHz currently scores 30106, while this processor scores 22143 on its own, that's a 1.36 performance gain for the dual CPU. Or, looking at the processor I am actually looking at, the [Dual CPU] Intel Xeon X5650 @ 2.67GHz, it scores 11675, while the same single CPU scores 7599, so 1.53 speed up.

  9. 2020年3月6日 · But for PerformanceTest V10 we did really major changes to the CPU test algorithms. These changes included. - Using new CPU instructions (e.g. AVX512) only available in modern CPUs. - Use a more up to date compiler (Visual Studio 2019 instead of 2013) which also brings some code optimization.

  10. 2023年7月24日 · Passmark is my personal standard benchmark for comparing CPUs. I would really love to see the CPU-Power of Raspberry Pis in comparison to others. So I tried uploading benchmarks, eg these

  1. 其他人也搜尋了