Yahoo奇摩 網頁搜尋

搜尋結果

  1. Cons: Soft below f11, inaccurate autofocus, soft at ends of range, flare. Sharpness: 8 Aberrations: 7 Bokeh: 8 Handling: 7 Value: 7. I have the Promaster Spectrum 7 branded version, but identified by Lightroom or Flickr as "TAMRON 28-300mm F3.5-6.3 Ultra zoom XR" from camera metadata.

  2. The 28-300 has a bit less PF than the 60-300, so that's one advantage. As long as lighting is adequate (or you have a camera with excellent high-ISO performance, like the K-x) and you stop it down a bit, it's capable of taking sharp, nicely saturated photos with good detail, even when viewed at full resolution.

  3. 2009年10月28日 · Yes, the Tamron 70-300mm is notably sharper than an older superzoom at the long end, but does have some CA in high contrast shots, unfortunately. The 55-300mm bests them in both respects if you can accord it. I haven't compared the two, but you can check out some sample pictures. 10-28-2009, 10:51 AM.

  4. 2023年3月20日 · Tamron AF Aspherical LD [171D, 271D, 571D, 171A] 28-200mm F3.8-5.6 reviews and specifications. This is the 2nd, quite improved generation of Tamrons' commercially very successful 28-200mm supe I was given this lens by a friend, and if I'm honest I wasn't immediately impressed, but I'm starting to see it has some qualities.

  5. Tamron Di LD Macro 70-200mm F2.8 Tamron SP AF XR LD Aspherical IF Di II 17-50mm F2.8 Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 50mm F2.8 Tamron AF XR Di LD Macro SP 28-75mm F2.8 Vivitar (komine) Auto Telephoto 135mm F2.8 Tamron SP AF Di Macro (272E) 90mm

  6. 2011年5月28日 · Constant f/2.8 aperture, sharp across the frame at f/2.8, and ridiculously sharp when stopped down, with no noticeable vignetting or distortions. And since it will focus within a few inches of the front element, it's even good for some quasi-macro work. And best of all, they often go on eBay for around $300 used.

  7. 2012年7月12日 · none of them. I owned Tamron 28-300mm before and sold it after 3 months. Sharpness is low and 28mm at the wide end is not wide enough for shooting indoor. I would consider 18-250mm for good zoom range. However, I heard that Tamron 18-250mm would be a better choice than Sigma.

  8. 2021年9月11日 · It gives a nice, wide, low end and a decent tele on the other end. It could be quicker, in regards to both focusing in low light and aperture, but for the price I got if for (less than $400 CDN), I have no complaints. Tamron XR Di AF (# A06) 28-300mm F3.5-6.3 reviews and specifications. This lens is the successor to the 185D: Di = digitally ...

  9. 2018年12月22日 · Tamron Adaptall-2 SP LD IF - 60B 300mm F2.8 reviews and specifications. Tamrons' fast 300's were probably their best adaptall lenses, they were certainly the most expensive. I love this lens.

  10. 2014年8月30日 · Tamron 70-300 was my first lens purchased after kit and still my only one that reaches to 300mm. great bang for buck option and I have taken many of my faves with it. 09-01-2014, 06:43 AM - 1 Like

  1. 其他人也搜尋了