搜尋結果
2024年6月9日 · Trialectics is the third essential current of the logical thinking that evolved from Aristotle's formal logic and Hegel's dialectics. Therefore, we are first going to explore the basic axioms of formal logic and dialectics and then compare them with trialectics. The three logics. FORMAL LOGIC AXIOMS. 1. AXIOM OF IDENTITY.
Building on this foundation and integrating Gregory Bateson’s notion of Learning I (linear), Learning II (complex), and Learning III (hyper-complex), others have proposed the notion of triple-loop learning. For example, Richard Hummelbrunner proposes triple-loop learning as a means of making “the value base of evaluations more explicit”:
2020年5月9日 · Stochastic tinkering is a process of trial and error, present in all creative endeavors, where randomness plays a great role. Taleb writes, in his essay The Birth of Stochastic Science (PDF): - The world is giving us more “cheap options”, and options benefit principally from uncertainty.
"World-systems theory (also known as world-systems analysis or the world-systems perspective) is a post-Marxist multidisciplinary approach to world history and social change which emphasizes the world-system (and not nation states) as the primary (but not exclusive) unit of social analysis.
"Network topology is the study of the arrangement or mapping of the elements (links, nodes, etc.) of a network, especially the physical (real) and logical (virtual) interconnections between nodes. It is important to note that the physical and logical topologies might be identical in any particular network but they also may be different.
Contents. 1 Description. 2 Discussion. 2.1 Testing Theory Through Action. 2.2 Approaching Problems As A Unique Set Of Local Conditions. 2.3 Key Conditions That Must Be Addressed. 3 Notes. Description. "Boundary Spanning" was probably popularized by Richard L. Daft in 1989, in his book "Organizational Theory and Design" [1].
At Bridgewater, the procedure they use is believability-weighted decision making. “Believability-weighted” means to weigh the opinions of people who are more believable more heavily than less believable people. This is distinctly different from weighing everyone’s votes equally, as in a democracy.
