Yahoo奇摩 網頁搜尋

搜尋結果

  1. That changed when social networking became social media around 2009, between the introduction of the smartphone and the launch of Instagram. Instead of connection—forging latent ties to people and organizations we would mostly ignore—social media offered platforms through which people could publish content as widely as possible, well beyond their networks of immediate contacts.

  2. Twitter, Facebook, Instagram). So we could think of an eco-network as skirting the boundary between rigid pseudo-control and a free-for-all. In my mind, an eco-network is the social equivalent of that strange attractor within a system that generates To ...

  3. Description. Jay Jamison: "Interest-based social networks have a markedly different focus and approach than Facebook. The Pinterest, Thumb and Foodspottings of the world enable users to focus and organize around their interests first, whereas Facebook focuses on a user’s personal relationships. Facebook offers us a social utility to deepen ...

  4. 2022年11月2日 · 4.1.6 Privilege and Social Hierarchy. 4.2 Three Woke Hypocrisies. 5 Typology. 5.1 Explanations for the Spread of Woke Ideology. 5.1.1 Idealist Accounts. 5.1.2 Psychological accounts. 5.1.3 Materialist explanation 1: Incentives. 5.1.4 Materialist account 2: The Woke Labor Thesis. 5.1.5 Institutional accounts.

  5. As I see it, there are three main strategies being deployed. All have their strength and weaknesses, and I then conclude with the positioning of the P2P Foundation in that field. 1. First there are the hackers and their continuous attempt to create alternative infrastructures and to connect them to each other.

  6. Often, they force users to condense their thoughts in the extreme (in the case of Twitter or Facebook) or to reduce them to images (in the case of Instagram). Surveillance footage is the supreme example of a fragment: only the transgression is televised, often from a single viewpoint (the hidden God’s-eye-view of the camera) without any ...

  7. Brynjolfsson lists several ways that technological changes can contribute to inequality: robots and automation, for example, are eliminating some routine jobs while requiring new skills in others (see “How Technology is Destroying Jobs”).