搜尋結果
Seditious libel is a criminal offence under common law of printing written material with seditious purpose – that is, the purpose of bringing contempt upon a political authority. It remains an offence in Canada but has been abolished in England and Wales.
作出具煽動意圖的作為 （sedition）、 煽動性誹謗 （seditious libel）及 煽動意圖 （seditious intention）相關的罪名，是源於英國 普通法 的刑事罪行。 現在仍然是香港的刑事罪行。 煽動叛亂 的概念，英語也譯作sedition。 作出具煽動意圖的作為是指一些公然行動，例如演說、籌募組織；而該行動被當局視為有傾向引發 起事 ，針對建制秩序。 如果該聲明以書寫或其他永久性方式（例如繪圖）發佈，則稱為煽動性誹謗。 永久形式誹謗（libel）是法律術語。 英國 [ 編輯] 煽動性誹謗是英國的歷史法律，現已廢除。 19世紀 占士·史提芬 的著作《刑事法律撮要》寫道：
2 天前 · Quick Reference. Seditious libel is the crime of making public statements that threaten to undermine respect for the government, laws, or public officials. The Sedition Act of 1798 made it a crime ... From: seditious libel in The Oxford Guide to the United States Government ».
2023年7月31日 · Written by Douglas E. Lee, published on July 31, 2023 , last updated on February 18, 2024. The concept of seditious libel arrived in North America with the first English colonists. Many colonists, however, found that the opportunities for freedom in America were inconsistent with the laws that smacked of tyranny.
2018年9月17日 · Published: Sept. 17, 2018. By Professor Stephen D. Solomon, Editor, First Amendment Watch. The landmark decision of New York Times v. Sullivan brought an end to the reign of seditious libel in America. Seditious libel was the crime of criticizing government or public officials, and was long justified on several grounds.
Encyclopedias almanacs transcripts and maps. Seditious Libel. views 3,846,377 updated. SEDITIOUS LIBEL. Though its scope has varied greatly with time and place, the heart of the doctrine of seditious libel is the proposition that government may punish its critics for words it perceives as a threat to its survival.
The cornerstone of Erskine's legal and political argument was the constitutional basis of trial by jury and its right to decide both fact and law in criminal libel trials. The issue of jury rights in seditious libel trials had been heatedly debated in eighteenth-century
